2009
06.28

  "Junk DNA"  Courtesy Crystal Links.com 2009

"Junk DNA" Courtesy Crystal Links.com 2009

By Amy Price PhD

 

Not so many years ago we were told as students that a very small part of the genome coded for genes and the rest was ‘Junk DNA”. The questions why? followed by what if  come quickly when I am faced with such literal statements. The answer they are junk because no one knows what they do brought cause for alarm in my view because I don’t know what a good portion of the human race does  yet I would not relegate them to junk. I countered with I want to know what happened when you took them all out…turns out that was not doable and I was relegated to the divergent thinker category and lectured on the KISS (Keep It Simple Stupid) principle.

I later found a few people such as McClintock who saw this DNA may have value in the 1940s and worked tirelessly  to explore the DNA as a regulatory source for determining which genes are turned on and when they were activated (McClintock, 1965) Around the same time  Britten and  Davidson agreed and further  speculated the junk DNA plays a role in generating different cell types and different biological structures, depending on where in the genome they insert themselves (Britten & Davidson, 1969).

Recently, scientists from Princeton  and Indiana Universities studied the genome of a pond organism and found  that junk DNA or transposons may perform functions that are central to the existence of an organism. Apparently  these genes jump from location to location rearranging  the genome in a way that initiates growth just as McClintock thought. 

These genes are labelled transposons. In and during development, the transposons appear to first influence hundreds of thousands of DNA pieces to regroup. Then, when they are no longer needed the organism can erase the transposases from its genetic material, paring its genome to about 5 percent of its original load.

“The transposons actually perform a central role for the cell,” said Laura Landweber, a professor of ecology and evolutionary biologyat Princeton and an author of the study. “They stitch together the genes in working form.” This research  appeared in the May 15 edition of Science. (MacPherson, Princeton, 2009)

We are just now finding the science that existed in the mind of a researcher over sixty years ago and can watch revelation unravel as  science begins to explore how extensive the role of  junk  or as sometimes coined selfish DNA plays in  the circle of life….Sometimes just as in life it is those quietly working without accolades that are holding it all together who are the real stars!
Britten, R. J., & Davidson, E. H. Gene regulation for higher cells: A theory. Science 165, 349–357 (1969)

 McClintock, B. Components of action of the regulators Spm and Ac. Carnegie Institution of Washington Year Book 64, 527–536 (1965)

MacPherson ,2009 http://www.princeton.edu/main/news/archive/S24/28/32C04/ accessed june 27, 2009)

  • Share/Bookmark
2009
06.13


By Amy Price PhD

“The procedure is totally simple and cheap,” reports UNSW’s Dr Nick Di Girolamo (lead author of research study), “Unlike other techniques, it requires no foreign human or animal products, only the patient’s own serum, and is completely non-invasive. This preliminary trial was conducted on three people, two with extensive corneal damage resulting from multiple surgeries to remove ocular melanomas, and one with the genetic eye condition aniridia. The patient with aniridia had damage in both eyes so stem cells were taken from the conjunctiva area. Because stem cells have not yet differentiated into specific cells they could grow into the cells that were needed. Each patient’s sight improved significantly after only a couple of months

Here is how it works. Less than a millimeter of tissue is taken from the ocular surface of the patients own eye. It takes a couple of hours to prepare the eye and put the contact lens with the baby cells in place and the patient goes home. The stem cells are cultured on a post surgical contact lens which is then placed onto the damaged cornea for 10 days, during which time the cells are able to re-colonise and heal the damaged eye surface. Apparently it took some experimentation to find a lens that could be successfully used as a scaffold for the cells.

The scientists on this research project see this therapy as a simple way to restore sight for eyes damaged by scarring, chemotherapy and a range of other disorders. They suggest that all is needed is a simple lab and qualified medical personnel putting it within reach of even third world countries

Di Girolamo, Nick; Bosch, Martina; Zamora, Katherine; Coroneo, Minas T.; Wakefield, Denis; Watson, Stephanie L. A Contact Lens-Based Technique for Expansion and Transplantation of Autologous Epithelial Progenitors for Ocular Surface Reconstruction. Transplantation, 2009; 87 (10): 1571 DOI: 10.1097/TP.0b013e3181a4bbf2

  • Share/Bookmark